Anterior segment optical coherence tomography meibography compared with keratograph meibography.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of using readily accessible technology, anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), to detect and grade meibomian gland dropout and examine its interchangeability with the Oculus Keratograph 5M (K5M). METHODS: A total of 30 participants (30 eyes) with a median age of 21 (range = 19-28 years) were recruited. Meibography was performed using two commercially available imaging devices to look at the structure of the meibomian glands and grade them subjectively in real time, and image analysis was used to quantify meibomian gland loss objectively. Gland loss as imaged by the two techniques was graded using the meiboscore grading schema. Test-retest reliability was determined with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Weighted kappa was used to evaluate agreement between the two imaging devices and four methods of image analysis. Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients were used to determine the association of structural measurements between each of the techniques. The agreement between the two imaging techniques was determined with the Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: Reliability of subjective grading was strong for AS-OCT (ICC: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.83-0.96, p < 0.001) and K5M (ICC: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.96-0.91, p = 0.001). Image analysis with ImageJ reliability was strong between the imaging devices (ICC: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.55-0.94, p < 0.001). Agreement between each subjective technique was fair, κ = 0.45 (95% CI: 0.17-0.73, p < 0.001) and a positive Spearman correlation was also observed (r = 0.52, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the mean meibomian gland loss measured with ImageJ between AS-OCT and K5M (0.92 ± 6.28, p = 0.26). The 95% limits of agreement were -12.45% to +14.04%. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest subjective real-time grading of meibomian gland loss could be performed using readily available AS-OCT technology and that this method was interchangeable with the K5M.

Short-term corneal endothelial response to wear of silicone-hydrogel contact lenses in East Asian eyes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate corneal endothelial bleb response to wear of silicone-hydrogel contact lenses in eyes of East Asian subjects. METHODS: A total of 24 subjects of East Asian origin, attended 3 separate sessions for a prospective, single-centre, trial. The following contact lenses were used: ACUVUE ADVANCE with HYDRACLEAR (ADVANCE, -3 dioptres), ACUVUE OASYS with HYDRACLEAR Plus (OASYS, -3 dioptres), Focus NIGHT & DAY (NIGHT & DAY, -3 dioptres) and SofLens 38 (+3 dioptres). A modified Balaam's crossover design was used to randomize presentation of sessions and contact lenses within sessions. Session 1 was a comparison between OASYS and SofLens 38 under closed eye conditions, session 2 was a comparison between ADVANCE and NIGHT & DAY under open eye conditions, and session 3 was a comparison between OASYS and NIGHT & DAY worn under closed eye conditions. Corneal endothelial images were captured with the Topcon SP-3000P noncontact Specular Microscope before lens wear, after 20 mins of wear with lenses on and 5 and 10 mins later after lens removal. Blebs were manually identified on these digital images by a masked observer. The area of blebs and total area under consideration were derived using ImageNet software and used to calculate percentage area of blebs. A boundary of equivalence of 1% was used as a clinically significant bleb area difference, and two-sided 95% confidence intervals were utilized to evaluate differences between lenses within each session. RESULTS: In session 1, SofLens 38 produced a mean percentage area of blebs of 8.0% under closed eye conditions, which was significantly different to that produced by OASYS (1.6%). In session 2, both Advance and Night & Day produced a mean percentage bleb area of 0.4% under open eye conditions. In session 3, OASYS and NIGHT & DAY produced statistically similar mean percentage bleb areas of 1.7% and 2.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The similarity of bleb responses induced by the silicone-hydrogel lenses under the tested wearing conditions is consistent with the proposition that increases in Dk/t above a certain level will produce minimal change in corneal physiologic conditions compared with that when no lens is worn.

A 12-month prospective clinical trial of comfilcon A silicone-hydrogel contact lenses worn on a 30-day continuous wear basis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical performance of comfilcon A (Biofinity) during 12 months of continuous wear compared to other silicone-hydrogel lenses. METHOD: Forty-five subjects were fitted in one eye with the comfilcon A (test) lens. For 22 subjects, the other eye was fitted with lotrafilcon A (group A) and for the remaining 23 subjects the other eye was fitted with balafilcon A (group B). Twelve-month data are presented on 48 measured variables. RESULTS: There were no serious adverse events during the course of the study. A total of 33 subjects completed the study, with only 4 discontinuations for lens-related reasons, spread proportionately between the lenses. On preference scales, the test lens was superior to both control lenses for comfort (p<0.05) and overall preference (p<0.05) and in group A for vision (p<0.05). On grading scales, the test lens scored better than both control lenses for overall comfort (p<0.1 for group A, p<0.05 for group B), comfort during the day (p<0.05), end-of-day comfort (p<0.05) and overall preference (p<0.05), and better in group A for general vision quality (p<0.01), night vision quality (p<0.01) and handling (p<0.05). All lenses performed to a comparable degree on the basis of microcysts and corneal staining. There were significant differences between lenses in producing limbal redness (p<0.05), bulbar conjunctival hyperemia (p<0.1) and conjunctival NaFl staining (p<0.01) with the control lens in group A showing the greatest effect and the control lens in group B the least. CONCLUSION: Comfilcon A offers performance advantages over first generation silicone-hydrogel materials for continuous wear.